Projektdetails
Knecht, Harald; BEd Dipl.-Päd. BA MA Prof.
Kulhanek-Wehlend, Gabriele; Hochschulprofessorin Mag. Dr. BEd OStR
Strasser, Thomas; Univ. Lektor Hochschulprofessor Mag. Dr.
The project is contextualized in the Faculties of Educational Sciences and in particular in the official studies of Initial Teacher Education (ITE) in kindergarten, Primary and Secondary Education. With the implementation of the European Higher Education Area, ITE in Europe converges in the incorporation of a significant period of school teaching practice (in-school placement) that in some cases constitutes up to 25% of the prospective teacher training. EU Commission, in its report “The Teaching Profession in Europe” (European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice,2015), highlights “real classroom experience” as one of the 3 key elements of ITE, emphasizing the importance of “in-school placement” at the same level of the “academic knowledge of their subject” and “teaching approaches”. A proper teacher training requires to be trained in these three elements. Surprisingly, academic policies do not generally value these three equally, and frequently, in-school placement is less valued, understanding that prospective teachers learn these skills naturally just by being placed in a school. This way, key processes to promote reflective learning of the teaching profession, such as collaboration, interaction, monitoring, and counselling processes are neglected.
In-school placement co-participated by university lecturers and non-university teaching tutors has a strategic character in the training of prospective teachers and sets a favourable scenario to promote the interaction between theory and practice, exercise professional skills and experiment proposals for educational innovation monitored by experienced professionals and analysed by educational researchers. However, the experience and the studies carried out on teaching practice show that, despite being a strategic scenario for student teachers training, the training experience can be improved, and this improvement can be implemented through the application of resources and services, delivered through e-learning. We therefore intend to address the needs for improving the training of student teachers during the implementation of in-school placements and therefore develop methodologies and e-learning solutions that have a real impact on the following aspects that clearly need to be improved:
• Dynamics to coordinate work between university and non-university teachers who supervise and accompany the student during the in-school placement period.
• Individualized follow-up of students in practice and their continued monitoring.
• An intelligent system that helps to support the self-learning process that every prospective teacher must record during the period of in-school teaching practice.
The project is contextualized in the Faculties of Educational Sciences and in particular in the official studies of Initial Teacher Education (ITE) in kindergarten, Primary and Secondary Education. With the implementation of the European Higher Education Area, ITE in Europe converges in the incorporation of a significant period of school teaching practice (in-school placement) that in some cases constitutes up to 25% of the prospective teacher training. EU Commission, in its report “The Teaching Profession in Europe” (European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice,2015), highlights “real classroom experience” as one of the 3 key elements of ITE, emphasizing the importance of “in-school placement” at the same level of the “academic knowledge of their subject” and “teaching approaches”. A proper teacher training requires to be trained in these three elements. Surprisingly, academic policies do not generally value these three equally, and frequently, in-school placement is less valued, understanding that prospective teachers learn these skills naturally just by being placed in a school. This way, key processes to promote reflective learning of the teaching profession, such as collaboration, interaction, monitoring, and counselling processes are neglected.
In-school placement co-participated by university lecturers and non-university teaching tutors has a strategic character in the training of prospective teachers and sets a favourable scenario to promote the interaction between theory and practice, exercise professional skills and experiment proposals for educational innovation monitored by experienced professionals and analysed by educational researchers. However, the experience and the studies carried out on teaching practice show that, despite being a strategic scenario for student teachers training, the training experience can be improved, and this improvement can be implemented through the application of resources and services, delivered through e-learning. We therefore intend to address the needs for improving the training of student teachers during the implementation of in-school placements and therefore develop methodologies and e-learning solutions that have a real impact on the following aspects that clearly need to be improved:
• Dynamics to coordinate work between university and non-university teachers who supervise and accompany the student during the in-school placement period.
• Individualized follow-up of students in practice and their continued monitoring.
• An intelligent system that helps to support the self-learning process that every prospective teacher must record during the period of in-school teaching practice.
Im Zusammenhang mit der Markteinführung im September 2016 wurde das Zentrum für Lerntechnologie und Innovation (ZLI) der Pädagogischen Hochschule Wien beauftragt, eine exemplarische Begleitstudie zu didaktischen Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Digi4School zu erstellen. Dabei wurden in enger Abstimmung mit dem Projektleiter der technischen Implementierung (Knowledge Markets) und in Zusammenarbeit mit E-Learning-erfahrenen Lehrkräften verschiedener Fachgegenstände einzelne Kapitel aus den digitalen Schulbüchern im Unterricht eingesetzt, wobei ergänzende Beispielmaterialien (als Open Educational Resources) entstehen und didaktische Empfehlungen abgeleitet werden.
Landeshauptmann Hans Niessl, gleichzeitig auch präsident des Landesschulrates Burgenland, bezeichnet auf der Website des Landesschulrates das Burgenland als „eine Modellregion im Bildungsbereich“ und erklärte das Jahr 2016 zum Jahr der Bildung. LMS.at, eine Entwicklung aus dem Burgenland, ist die am meisten genutzte Lernplattform Österreichs, zählt mit ca. 155 Millionen Zugriffen pro Jahr zu den größten Webauftritten des Landes und wird von ca. 100.000 Schüler/innen und Lehrer/innen im aktuellen Schuljahr genutzt. Über die LMS-Anwendung OTP (Opportunity to Practice) werden in unterschiedlichen Fachbereichen (Deutsch, Englisch, Mathematik, Geschichte…) eine Vielzahl an digitalen Unterrichtsmitteln bereitgestellt, die Lehrer/innen beim Unterrichten und Schüler/innen beim Lernen unterstützen. Über die Pädagogische Hochschule Burgenland werden jedes Jahr eine Vielzahl an Fort- und Weiterbildungsmöglichkeiten im bereich Digitalisierung des Unterrichts in Form von Präsenzverantstaltungen und Onlineveranstaltungen – in Kooperation mit dem Onlinecampus Virtuelle PH- angeboten. Über 50 burgenländische Schulen sind per September 2016 „eEducation-Expertschulen“ (vormals ELSA- und eCluster-Schulen). Schulen, in denen digitale Bildung einen ausgeprägten Schwerpunkt darstellt. Mit „digikomp4“, „digikomp8“, „digikomp12“ und „digikompP“ werden sowohl auf der Seite der Lernenden von der Grundschule bis zur Matura, als auch auf Seiten der Lehrenden Kompetenzmodelle entwickelt, die den Rahmen für den erforderlichen bzw. angestrebten digitalen Kompetenzerwerb darstellen sollen.
Es stellt sich nun die Frage, was im Rahmen der digitalen Bildung im burgenländischen Schulsystem tatsächlich passiert. In der Innovationstherorie wird dann von nachhaltiger Implementierung gesprochen, wenn innovationen (als solche sollten digitale Unterrichtsmaterialien nach einer fast 20-jährigen Implementierungsphase eigentlich nicht mehr bezeichnet werden müssen – dies ist aber der Fall – siehe das aktuelle Strategiepapier von Bundeskanzler Kern, schule 4.0) die „Late Majority“ (kommen nach den Innovators, den „early adopers“ und der „early Majority“) der Nutzer/innen, in unserem Fall die der Lehrer/innen erreicht (Rogers 2003, S.284). Trifft dies auf burgenländische Schulen zu?